Standard Patterns of Considerations in Law, District Regulation and Qanun Based on Legal Rules in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v2i2.2446Abstract
The consequence of the state of the law is legislation to be an essential instrument in regulating public life. However, in some parts of Indonesia, they can make their regional regulation slightly different from the constitution, wherein this article will focus on Qanun in Aceh Province. The research used in this paper is normative law research. This research used sequential data or library data. Secondary data consists of primary law materials, secondary law materials, and tertiary law materials. The approach method used is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. The formulation of the problem in this paper is how the standard pattern of consideration in the Law, Regional Regulations, and Qanun is based on legislation. The results show that in the Law in Consideration, Consider using the word "membentuk" or "form" because the law-making institution consists of legislative institutions and executive institutions. Regional regulation considers using the word "menetapkan" or "establish" because the institution that makes local regulations is a local government consisting of elements of local governments and local people's representative councils. This consideration follows Annex II of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Legislation as amended by Law Number 15 of 2019. However, the Qanun used the word "membentuk" or "form" due following Article 233 paragraph (1) of Law Number 11 the Year 2006 on Aceh Governance and Annex II of Aceh Qanun Number 5 of 2011 on the Procedures for the Establishment of Qanun.
Keywords:
Consideration, Law, Regional Regulation, QanunReferences
Bell, Gary F. “Decentralisation in Indonesia-Theory and Practice.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis 23, no. 1 (2004): 7.
Buehler, Michael, and Dani Muhtada. "Democratisation and the Diffusion of Shari'a Law." South-East Asia Research 24, no. 2 (2016): 261–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X16649311.
Butt, Simon. “Religious Conservatism, Islamic Criminal Law and the Judiciary in Indonesia: A Tale of Three Courts.” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 50, no. 3 (2018): 402–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532025.
Feener, R. Michael. “Engineering Transformations in the ‘Religion-Development Nexus’: Islamic Law, Reform, and Reconstruction in Aceh.” Religion 51, no. 1 (2021): 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1792051.
Ichwan, Moch Nur, Arskal Salim, and Eka Srimulyani. “Islam and Dormant Citizenship: Soft Religious Ethno-Nationalism and Minorities in Aceh, Indonesia.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 31, no. 2 (2020): 215–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2020.1780407.
Lay, Cornelis. “Political Linkages between CSOs and Parliament in Indonesia: A Case Study of Political Linkages in Drafting the Aceh Governance Law.” Asian Journal of Political Science 25, no. 1 (2017): 130–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2017.1297243.
AR, Suhariyono. (Hand-Book/Modul) Pembentukan (Perancangan) Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI, 2008.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
Asshidiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid 1. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK RI, 2006. https://dkpp.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/pengantar_ilmu_hukum_tata_negara.pdf.pdf.
Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Hukum dan HAM. Bahasa Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Depok: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2018.
Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Hukum dan HAM. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Depok: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2018.
Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Hukum dan HAM. Proses Penyusunan Peraturan Daerah. Depok: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2018. http://bpsdm.kemenkumham.go.id/index.php/course/modul-best-practice-kumham.
Effendi, Lutfi. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi. 1st ed. Malang: Bayu Media, 2003.
Ganjong. Pemerintahan Daerah Kajian Politik Hukum. 1st ed. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2007.
Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1997.
Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2005.
Kementerian Hukum dan HAM, and Japan International Cooperation Agency. Buku Tanya Jawab Seputar Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Tingkat Pusat. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2019.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif : Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. 17th ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2015.
Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan : (Jenis, Fungsi, Dan Materi Muatan). Jakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
Constitutional Court Decision No 137-PUU-XII_2015.
Constitutional Court Decision No. 56/PUU-XIV/2016.
Bawono, Adi Condro. “Perbedaan Keputusan Dengan Peraturan.” Hukum Online, 2012. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt4f0281130c750/perbedaan-keputusan-dengan-peraturan/.
Boemiya, Helmy. “Teori Kewenangan Dan Sumber-Sumber Kewenangan (Atribusi, Delegasi, Dan Mandat).” wordpress, 2014. https://boeyberusahasabar.wordpress.com/2013/12/10/sumber-kewenangan-atribusi-delegasi-dan-mandat/.
KBBI. “Arti Konsiderans.” In Kbbi. KBBI, 2021. https://kbbi.web.id/konsiderans.
Suantra, I Nengah. “Naskah Tutorial Teori Legislasi Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah.” Denpasar, 2016. https://simdos.unud.ac.id/uploads/file_pendidikan_1_dir/82772d18fda11e83fed7290646195f01.pdf.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.