Termination of Prosecutions Based On Restorative Justice in The Settlement of Criminal Cases In The Area of The High Prosecutors Of Lampung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25041/plr.v3i2.2734Abstract
The Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia has issued a breakthrough in efforts to resolve cases through the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice. The Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, a law enforcement officer referred to as a case controller based on the dominus litis principle has a significant role in determining the success of applying restorative justice in Indonesia. Therefore, this article examines and analyzes the implementation and inhibiting factors for stopping prosecutions based on restorative justice in settlement of criminal cases in the Lampung High Court area. The research method in writing this paper uses a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach, with 6 (six) sources from academics and the Public Prosecutor in the Lampung High Prosecutor's Office. The data is then processed and analyzed cumulatively. Based on the research results, the Lampung High Court has adopted the termination of restorative justice-based prosecutions in three (three) District Attorney's Offices. Meanwhile, the obstacle to stopping restorative justice-based prosecutions in the Lampung High Court area is dominated by overlapping arrangements for implementing restorative justice between law enforcement agencies, namely the Prosecutor's office and the police, which legal uncertainty and lead to disparities in law enforcement and the lack of community participation, especially among victims.
Keywords:
Implementation, Cessation of Prosecution, Restorative Justice IndonesiaReferences
start. Implementation of the “Restorative Justice” Approach in the Juvenile Justice System. Semarang: UNDIP, 2019.
Purba, Jonlar. Law Enforcement against Crimes with Minor Patterns with Restorative Justice. Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara, 2017.
Sasangko, Hari and Lily Rosita. Comments on the Criminal Procedure Code. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2003.
Waluyo, Bambang. Design of the Prosecutor's Function in Restorative Justice. Depok: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016.
A., Green, Bruce and L. Bazelon, “Restorative Justice from Prosecutors' Perspective”, Fordham L. Rev. 88 (2019): 2287-2318.
Afolab,. A and Essen Azu UDU. “The Jurisprudence of Restorative Justice For Victims Of Crime In Nigeria”, International Journal Of Comparative Law And Legal Philosophy (Ijocllep) 1, no. 1 (2020): 151-158.
Alamsyah, B. “Law Enforcement and Justice in Indonesia Between Expectations and Reality”, Legality: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (2017): 35-50, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v4i1.111.
Andriyanti, EF “The Urgency of Restorative Justice Implementation in Indonesian Criminal Law”, Journal of Education and development 8, no. 4 (2020): 326-331.
Anisya, AF, Hafrida and Erwin, “Comparative Study of Criminal Prosecution in the Perspective of the Evidence System under Indonesian and Thai Criminal Procedure Code.” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 2, no. 3 (2021): 59-75, DOI: https: //doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v2i3.14876.
Appludnopsanji and Pujiyono. “Restructuring the Legal Culture of Prosecutors in Prosecution as Independence in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System”, SASI 26, no. 4 (2020): 571-581, DOI: https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359.
HJ. Hermann, Donald. “Restorative justice and retributive justice: An opportunity for cooperation or an occasion for conflict in the search for justice”, Seattle J. Soc. Just. 16 (2017): 71-103.
Iqbal, M. “Implementation of the Effectiveness of the Principle of Opportunity in Indonesia on the Basis of the Public Interest”, Surya Kencana Satu Journal: The Dynamics of Legal and Justice Problems 9, no. 1 (2018): 87-100, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v9i1.1178.
Jülich, S. and Natalie Thorburn. “Sexual violence and substantive equality: Can restorative justice deliver?”, Journal of Human Rights and Social Work 2, no. 1 (2017): 34-44, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-017-0029-0.
Kristanto, A. "Review of the Attorney General's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice", Lex Renaissance 7, no. 1 (2022): 180-193, DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss1.art14.
Malik, F. "Overview of Legal Positivism Theory in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System", Journal of Citizenship Education Undiksha 9, no. 1 (2021): 188-196, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v9i1.31488.
Parera , Z. _ and ED Silambi . “Criminal Law Enforcement Against Hate Speech Crimes Through Social Media (Reviewed From Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions)”, Journal of Restorative Justice 2, no. 2 (2018): 160-176, DOI: https://doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v2i2.1931.
Perbawa, GP “Criminal Law Policy on the Existence of the Dominus Litis Principle in the Perspective of Professionalism and Prosecutors of the Public Prosecutor”, Arena Hukum 7, no. 3 (2014): 325-342, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arena Hukum.2014.00703.2.
Pujiyono, et al. “Restorative Justice Breakthrough By The Prosecutors To Maximize Terrorism Prevention Effort”, Multicultural Education 7, no. 10 (2021): 316-320.
Setyowati, D. "Understanding the Concept of Restorative Justice as an Effort of the Criminal Justice System to Achieve Justice", Pandecta Research Law Journal 15, no. 1 (2020): 121-141, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v15i1.24689.
Effendy, Marwan. " Restorative justice in the context of the Ultimum Remidiun on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption" Speech on the Inauguration of Professors at Sam Ratulangi University, Manado on October 4, 2012.
Haryadi, Prim. (Director General of the General Judiciary Agency) in the National Webinar "Implementation of Restorative Justice in Indonesia: Constraints and Solutions" on February 4, 2022, organized by the Faculty of Law, University of Mataram.
Justice Magazine Issue 74, January 2022.
Downloads
Total Abstract Views: 36 |
Total Downloads: 23
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright
Copyright (c) 2022 by the Auhtor(s) Published by Development Centre Research of Law and Scientific Publication on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
