THE URGENCY OF USING DISTINCTIVE SIGNS AT MUARO JAMBI  TEMPLE SITE: A REVIEW FROM THE INTERNATIONAL  HUMANITARIAN LAW PERSPECTIVE

Akbar Kurnia Putra; Bernard Sipahutar; Budi Ardianto

doi:10.25041/lajil.v2i1.1977

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v2i1.1977

Abstract

This article discusses the role of international law in the protection of the Muaro Jambi Temple site as a cultural place. In specific, the authors highlight the regulations to use distinctive signsfor historical and cultural propertyunder the International Humanitarian Law. Even though all Contracting Members should comply with the law, in reality, not all the rules are implemented, such as in Muaro Jambi Temple site.A site is a principal object that passes the historical value of human being as well as scientific information from generation to generation; therefore, is required protection. Using a normative juridical approach, the article analyses the basic problems for not applying distinctive signs at the Muaro Jambi Temple site.

Keywords:

Muaro Jambi Temple Site, Historical Property, International Humanitarian Law

References

Arifin, Hafidz Putra. “POLITIK HUKUM PERLINDUNGAN CAGAR BUDAYA DI INDONESIA”, Dialogia Juridica: Jurnal Hukum Bisnis dan Investasi 10, no. 1, 2018: 470-492, DOI: 10.25123/vej.3008.

Astuti, Mirsa. “EFEKTIFITAS HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL DALAM MELINDUNGI CAGAR BUDAYA DI NEGARA KONFLIK”, Delegalata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1, 2018: 96-107, DOI: 10.30596/dll.v3i1.3143.

Banjarani, Desia Rakhma et al., “PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP WARTAWAN PERANG DI DAERAH KONFLIK BERSENJATA MENURUT HUKUM INTERNASIONAL (STUDI KASUS DAERAH KONFLIK IRAK DAN SURIAH) PROTECTION OF WAR REPORTERS IN ARMED CONFLICT AREAS BASED ON INTERNATIONAL LAW (CASE STUDY OF THE IRAQ AND SYRIA CONFLICT),” Cepalo 3, no. 1, 2019: 11–18, DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v3no1.1789.

Murzaldan, Jufrian., Listriani, Sophia. “TANGGUNG JAWAB PESERTA TEMPUR DALAM MELINDUNGI BENDA CAGAR BUDAYA DALAM SUATU KONFLIK BERSENJATA”, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Kenegaraan 1, no. 2, 2017: 12-21.

Nugraha, Taufik Rahmat. “URGENSI PERLINDUNGAN BENDA BERSEJARAH DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL”, Mimbar Hukum 31, no. 3, 2019: 384-401, DOI: 10.22146/jmh.46446.

Rusmiyati. “MUSEUM SITUS DI KAWASAN MUARA JAMBI”, Thesis, Universitas Indonesia, 2014.

Sitanggang, F. D. “PENGRUSAKAN TEMPAT BERSEJARAH DALAM PERANG ANTAR NEGARA SEBAGAI PELANGGARAN HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL”, Lex et Societatis: Jurnal Hukum 1. no. 2, 2013: 5-14.

Wilimantara, Made Panji, I Made PasekDiantha, I Made Budi Arsika, “PENGHANCURAN BENDA BUDAYA (ICONOCLAST) SEBAGAI KEJAAHATAN TERHADAP KEMANUSIAAN”, Kertha Negara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 4, 2016: 1-6.

Herimanto. Ilmu Sosial & Budaya Dasar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011.

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar dan Etty R. Agoes. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Alumni, 2003.

UNESCO. UNESCO’S Response To Protect Culture In Crises, United Heritage. UK: United Nations Economic and Social Council, 2016.

Convention IV Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Landtahun 1907.

Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export, and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property 1970.

Convention the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War,” International Committee of the Red Cross, 1999.

Geneva Convention IV Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War 1949.

Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict1954.

Second Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of August 12 1949

UNESCO World Heritage Convention 1972.

https://kebudayaan.kemdikbud.go.id/bpcbjambi/kawasan-cagar-budaya-muarajambi/, Accessed on December 26, 2019.

https://kebudayaan.kemdikbud.go.id/ditwdb/menuju-warisan-budaya-dunia-proses-penetapan-warisan-budaya-tak-benda-intangible-cultural-heritage-dan-warisan-dunia-world-heritage-indonesia-oleh-unesco/, Accessed on December 1, 2019.